DR2 Extremadura (Spain)

Current status

Extremadura’s landscapes are dominated by dehesas. Their extension stretches along a third of Extremadura’s region, being the main forest type in the region. Dehesas have undergone profound changes in recent decades, either abandonment or intensification, which have compromised their environmental and economic viability. The increasing irregularity of rainfall has led to a loss of productivity and quality of the pasture, but also to advance of Phytophthora infection that causes the death of thousands of trees. These problems are common to all dehesa territories. 

There is a mismatch between challenges and solutions available for stakeholders of dehesas and similar agroforestry landscapes. This claims for innovative practices to improve dehesa sustainability in a context of increasingly harsh climate (drier and more unpredictable). The abandonment of traditional practices in many oak forestlands is resulting in fire-prone territories. The excessive encroachment of the woodlands entails also an increase in the dryness of the vegetation, which also favours the fire propagation, besides of decreased water yield at landscape and regional scales. 

 

Leader:
UEX

Regional authority:
Junta de Extremadura

Monitored farms:

This DR includes: 

  • A highly monitored farm with 3 sites equipped with eddy-covariance stations and sensors for soil, pasture, trees and climate measurements. Each station monitors an area of around 20 ha.
  •  A network of farms for the implementation of NBSs and a Fire-Smart Territory. 

Actions to be implemented: 

  • Development of guidelines to monitor soil, vegetation and groundwater indicators, including the use of RS tools, to assess the implementation of NBS. 
  • Evaluation of process-based and agroforestry model performance to assess NBS, including the evaluation of water dynamics, tree mortality and fire simulations. 
  • Engagement with stakeholders in participatory processes and dissemination activities.

    Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

    • More than 5 NBSs evaluated 
    • 2 models applied
    • 10 landscape simulation 
    • 10 stakeholders groups interested in the proposed NBSs 
    • 10 farmers participating 
    • 40 users attending workshops 
    • 2 policy recommendations elaborated

     

    Videos

    Latest News